-
財務簽證
財務簽證
-
稅務簽證
稅務簽證
-
營業稅簽證
營業稅簽證
-
公開發行及上市櫃專案輔導與規劃
公開發行及上市櫃專案輔導與規劃
-
IFRS專區
IFRS專區
-
移轉訂價服務
移轉訂價服務
-
跨國交易租稅規劃
跨國交易租稅規劃
-
外國專業投資機構之稅務代理人
外國專業投資機構之稅務代理人
-
所得稅法第四條及第二十五條專案核定申請
所得稅法第四條及第二十五條專案核定申請
-
租稅協定之專案申請
租稅協定之專案申請
-
租稅獎勵申請
租稅獎勵申請
-
稅負平衡政策訂定與假定稅計算
稅負平衡政策訂定與假定稅計算
-
代為計算薪資及各項扣繳
代為計算薪資及各項扣繳
-
資遣通報
資遣通報
-
處理薪資轉帳事宜及繳納扣繳稅款
處理薪資轉帳事宜及繳納扣繳稅款
-
勞保賠償給付申請
勞保賠償給付申請
-
勞健保,二代健保及退休金之申報及繳納
勞健保,二代健保及退休金之申報及繳納
-
年底開立扣繳憑單
年底開立扣繳憑單
-
IT 顧問服務
IT 顧問服務
-
PRIMA 顧問服務
PRIMA 顧問服務
-
營運計劃書編制
營運計劃書編制
-
績效考核服務
正大聯合會計師事務所協助企業進行績效制度建立及優化,協助管理者與員工在目標上達成共識,並透過激勵和幫助員工取得優異績效從而實現組織目標的管理,真實反映員工的工作表現,目的在幫助企業激發員工的工作熱情和提高員工的能力和素質,淘汰不良員工,客觀具體、制度公平,迅速反映員工在職能上的表現並調整工作內容,創造勞資雙贏的局面。
-
沙賓氏法案第404條遵循查核
沙賓氏法案第404條遵循查核
-
內部稽核服務
內部稽核服務
-
協議程序(併購交易實地查核)
協議程序(併購交易實地查核)
-
風險管理服務
協議程序(併購交易實地查核)
-
舞弊調查服務
舞弊調查服務
-
電腦鑑識服務
電腦鑑識服務
-
外籍人士工作證申請
外籍人士工作證申請
-
商業文件英日文翻譯服務
商業文件英日文翻譯服務
-
公司、分公司、行號設立登記
公司、分公司、行號設立登記
-
外商分公司、辦事處設立登記
外商分公司、辦事處設立登記
-
陸資來台投資設立登記
陸資來台投資設立登記
-
行政救濟
行政救濟
-
企業法律諮詢
企業法律諮詢
-
破產與限制
破產與限制
-
公司解散和清算
公司解散和清算
-
供應商和員工背景調查
供應商和員工背景調查
-
存證信函草稿服務
存證信函草稿服務
-
中英文協議的準備和審查
中英文協議的準備和審查
-
放寬限制出境
放寬限制出境
-
勞動法合規與勞資談判
勞動法合規與勞資談判
-
企業和個人資產規劃
企業和個人資產規劃
-
企業評價服務
企業評價服務
-
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)
-
財團法人及社團法人等非營利組織(公益慈善基金會)
財團法人及社團法人等非營利組織(公益慈善基金會)
-
文化教育相關產業(私立學校)
文化教育相關產業(私立學校)
-
其他政府委託專案查核
其他政府委託專案查核
Nick Jeffrey says the accountancy profession needs closer ties with academia
Accountants should work more closely with academia. That was my key takeaway from a trip to Edinburgh last week for the British Accounting and Finance Association meet. It is clear that the academics welcome input from practitioners and I found myself volunteering to share some of my experiences with their students. And I got the impression that lecturers would welcome much more practical input at all stages of research and in all aspects of their work.
Take auditing. The conference heard about some of the research projects under way. It struck me that a lot of the research is reactive. For example: one project looked at one finding from one audit regulator. I felt that was a missed opportunity to look at broader contributing factors.
A gaping hole for investors, and consequently researchers, is the lack of agreement around audit quality indicators (AQIs). Understandably researchers seek to prove causal links between audit quality and things like cost of equity, cost of debt and company performance. The theory is that a strong, robust audit brings lower cost of capital. In the absence of generally accepted AQIs, the researchers must use a proxy for audit quality, and they choose things like audit firm size or market share measured by equity value or number of audits. All of these are misleading for users of an audit. The academics I spoke to understand that but they also told me they need to use something.
Practitioners should shoulder some of the blame here. There have been long-running debates within the profession about AQIs. Just about the only thing we can agree on is that it is difficult. Oh, and that we don't agree! That needs to change or someone else will fill the void. And that could well be a result that we find unsatisfactory, or worse is misleading for investors and other market participants.
For me tax also seems to be ripe for research. In my view the tax profession is facing similar pressures now that the audit profession was facing 15 years ago – public criticism, trust on the wane, professional standards under scrutiny and self-regulation being questioned. In contrast to the result for auditors I don't see many calling for independent regulation of the tax profession. At least, not yet. That could change if there are one or two more examples of what is deemed unacceptable behaviour in the court of public opinion.
Collectively practitioners must help the academic community. We should explain the pressures we and our clients are facing today. We should explain the practicalities behind those live issues. We should demonstrate where we believe academic research could contribute to a step-change in the public benefit attributed to the work of the profession.
Individually, we should support student development by sharing our stories of what it is like at the coal face. I have been remiss in not doing so before. Have you?
Nick Jeffrey is director, global public policy at Grant Thornton