-
財務簽證
財務簽證
-
稅務簽證
稅務簽證
-
營業稅簽證
營業稅簽證
-
公開發行及上市櫃專案輔導與規劃
公開發行及上市櫃專案輔導與規劃
-
IFRS專區
IFRS專區
-
移轉訂價服務
移轉訂價服務
-
跨國交易租稅規劃
跨國交易租稅規劃
-
外國專業投資機構之稅務代理人
外國專業投資機構之稅務代理人
-
所得稅法第四條及第二十五條專案核定申請
所得稅法第四條及第二十五條專案核定申請
-
租稅協定之專案申請
租稅協定之專案申請
-
租稅獎勵申請
租稅獎勵申請
-
稅負平衡政策訂定與假定稅計算
稅負平衡政策訂定與假定稅計算
-
代為計算薪資及各項扣繳
代為計算薪資及各項扣繳
-
資遣通報
資遣通報
-
處理薪資轉帳事宜及繳納扣繳稅款
處理薪資轉帳事宜及繳納扣繳稅款
-
勞保賠償給付申請
勞保賠償給付申請
-
勞健保,二代健保及退休金之申報及繳納
勞健保,二代健保及退休金之申報及繳納
-
年底開立扣繳憑單
年底開立扣繳憑單
-
IT 顧問服務
IT 顧問服務
-
PRIMA 顧問服務
PRIMA 顧問服務
-
營運計劃書編制
營運計劃書編制
-
績效考核服務
正大聯合會計師事務所協助企業進行績效制度建立及優化,協助管理者與員工在目標上達成共識,並透過激勵和幫助員工取得優異績效從而實現組織目標的管理,真實反映員工的工作表現,目的在幫助企業激發員工的工作熱情和提高員工的能力和素質,淘汰不良員工,客觀具體、制度公平,迅速反映員工在職能上的表現並調整工作內容,創造勞資雙贏的局面。
-
沙賓氏法案第404條遵循查核
沙賓氏法案第404條遵循查核
-
內部稽核服務
內部稽核服務
-
協議程序(併購交易實地查核)
協議程序(併購交易實地查核)
-
風險管理服務
協議程序(併購交易實地查核)
-
舞弊調查服務
舞弊調查服務
-
電腦鑑識服務
電腦鑑識服務
-
外籍人士工作證申請
外籍人士工作證申請
-
商業文件英日文翻譯服務
商業文件英日文翻譯服務
-
公司、分公司、行號設立登記
公司、分公司、行號設立登記
-
外商分公司、辦事處設立登記
外商分公司、辦事處設立登記
-
陸資來台投資設立登記
陸資來台投資設立登記
-
行政救濟
行政救濟
-
企業法律諮詢
企業法律諮詢
-
破產與限制
破產與限制
-
公司解散和清算
公司解散和清算
-
供應商和員工背景調查
供應商和員工背景調查
-
存證信函草稿服務
存證信函草稿服務
-
中英文協議的準備和審查
中英文協議的準備和審查
-
放寬限制出境
放寬限制出境
-
勞動法合規與勞資談判
勞動法合規與勞資談判
-
企業和個人資產規劃
企業和個人資產規劃
-
企業評價服務
企業評價服務
-
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)
-
財團法人及社團法人等非營利組織(公益慈善基金會)
財團法人及社團法人等非營利組織(公益慈善基金會)
-
文化教育相關產業(私立學校)
文化教育相關產業(私立學校)
-
其他政府委託專案查核
其他政府委託專案查核
At first glance, the country-by-country (CbC) reporting required under the OECD Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Action Plan would appear to be relatively risk- and trouble-free. Yet despite being brief it opens up a minefield of definitional challenges and requirements.
In this briefing we outline how effective management of CBC reporting is going to require a new way of looking at transfer pricing and a more systematic approach to justification and documentation, along with possible restructuring within the business.
So why is CbC reporting generating a growing amount of concern?
The first challenge is that a lot of the information is hard to source or evaluate. While detailed data in areas such as headcount are typically available at divisional level, many firms will find it difficult to break this down to the entity level as required under CbC reporting.
This means that CbC reporting will be a much more demanding exercise than the template forms would suggest. While larger businesses generally have the necessary people and systems in place, many of their mid-size counterparts will need to develop the required capabilities from scratch.
Risk of misinterpretation
CbC reporting also opens up new risks. In particular, a local tax authority could compare the headcount to the amount of tax a company is paying in their jurisdiction and conclude that they are missing out on their rightful share of the overall tax take.
So how can you prepare?
With the regime starting in January 2016, and the first reports due from the end of 2017, the time to begin preparing is now, but how?
1. Gap analysis
The first step would be to complete the template as a dry run and then use this as the basis for a gap analysis of what information needs to be sourced.
2. Assess how you tax arrangements will come across
How the tax you pay compare to headcounts and returns on the template form. Then assess whether there are apparent anomalies.
3. Prepare robust justification
It’s important to ensure that tax allocations are substantiated by appropriate justification and supporting documentation.
4. Begin restructuring in good time
The complexities of entity reporting are likely to provide a fresh catalyst for the rationalisation of multiple entities.
While preparing fully now may be a time consuming and expensive exercise, it puts you in greater control over your tax affairs by making it easier to demonstrate that your company is paying its share.
Talk to your local firm about how Grant Thornton can help your organisation prepare for Country by Country Reporting requirements.